🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.